IALA
International Auxiliary Language Association
Personas eminente detra le creation de interlinguaSIRI = "Sacre Imperio Roman Interlinguan"
SIRNE = "Sacre Imperio Roman de Nationes Europee"
Earle B. Babcock, decano del New York University, membro del gruppo que precedeva le IALA in 1923,
le prime presidente (1924-1936) del IALA
Dr Stephen P. Duggan, cofundator e director del IIE (Institute of International Education), membro del gruppo
que precedeva le IALA in 1923, le 3e e ultime presidente (1940-1950) del IALA
Presidente del American Cooperative Committee of the Pan-European Union 1925-1940
Dr John H. Finley, in 1892 le plus juvene presidente de un universitate in le SUA (Knox College),
1918-1919 Commissario del Cruce Rubie in Palestina, membro del gruppo que precedeva le IALA in 1923,
1937-38 editor-in-chief del New York Times, le 2e presidente (1936-1940) del IALA
Dr Alfred N. Goldsmith, vice-president and general manager of the RCA (Radio Corporation of America),
membro del gruppo que precedeva le IALA in 1923 e in 1951 membro del directorate de IALA
Arthur Arton Hamerschlag, the first president of the CIT (Carnegie Institute of Technology), membro del gruppo
que precedeva le IALA in 1923 e in 1951 membro del directorate de IALA
General James G. Harbord, un del plus famose generales in le historia del armea de SUA, 1917 chef del stato
major de gen. John J. Pershing, commandante del American Fortias Expeditionari in Francia, 1918
commandante del 2e division in le 2e battalia de Marne, presidente e in 1930 presidente del
consilio directive del RCA (Radio Corporation of America), membro del gruppo que precedeva le IALA in
1923, presidente del Committee de Budget del IALA
Frederick Paul Keppel, dean of the Columbia University, secretary of the American Association for International
Conciliation, third assistant secretary of war, director of foreign operations for the American Red Cross,
commissioner for the United States International Chamber of Commerce, 1923-1941 president of the Carnegie
Corporation of New York, membro del gruppo que precedeva le IALA in 1923
![]()
"After the penance comes the
absolution. You will find
peace only at the lance's
point. Son of France, go,
go, go! I will help you.
Go hardily to Verdun!"The Broken Soldier
and the Maid of France
by Henry Van Dyke
Frederick Paul Keppel Membro del gruppo que precedeva le IALA in 1923
ENCYCLOPEDIA AMERICANA, 1975, VOLUMINE 16
KEPPEL, Frederick Paul
American educator; b. Staten Island, N.Y., July 2, 1875; d. New York City, Sept. 9, 1943. He was educated at Columbia University, from which he graduated with an A.B. degree in 1898. In 1900 he became assistant secretary of that institution, and secretary two years later; and in 1910, at the age of 35, he was made dean of the College. He held this position until 1918. From 1908 to 1918 he was secretary of the American Association for International Conciliation, and for the following year acted as third assistant secretary of war. During 1919-1920 he served as director of foreign operations for the American Red Cross; and in 1920-1922 he was commissioner for the United States International Chamber of Commerce. From 1923 to 1941 he was president of the Carnegie Corporation of New York. His publications included The Undergraduate and His College (1917), Education for Adults (1926), The Foundation (1930), and Philanthropy and Learning (1936).http://www.columbia.edu/cu/libraries/inside/projects/findingaids/rbml_collections/html/4078981.html Frederick Paul Keppel Papers [ca. 1880]-1943.
Phys. Desc: ca. 38,000 items (71 boxes)
Call Number: Ms Coll/Keppel, F.P.
Location: Rare Book and Manuscript Library,
Subjects: Columbia College (New York, N.Y.)--Administration.; Carnegie Corporation of New York.; Century Club.; Columbia University Club.; United States.--War Dept.; Baker, Newton Diehl, 1871-1937.; United States--Commerce.; United States--Politics and government--20th century.; United States--Social life and customs.; New York (N.Y.)--Social life and customs.; Education--United States.; Arts--United States.; College administrators.; Executives.; Government executives. Creator: Keppel, Frederick P. (Frederick Paul), 1875-1943.Biographical Note
Dean of Columbia College, 1910-1918. Columbia University A.B., 1898, Litt.D., 1929.
Scope and Contents
Correspondence, memoranda, and legal and financial documents of Keppel. The files deal largely with Keppel's personal and professional life during his tenure as President of the Carnegie Corporation, and also include some files from his years as Newton D. Baker's Third Assistant Secretary of War, and as Dean of Columbia College. There are extensive files of correspondence from and to Keppel's parents and children, as well as files concerning his activities in organizations such as the Century and Columbia University Clubs. The letters from friends and business associates concern American education, politics, business, and cultural life, particularly in the New York metropolitan area, from 1900 to 1943. LWEB bottom navigation bar
© Columbia University Libraries
http://www.roizen.com/ron/dissch8.htm THE AMERICAN DISCOVERY OF ALCOHOLISM, 1933-1939
CHAPTER VIII
From the Carnegie Grant to "Bowman's Compromise," October 1938-December 1939
Over the course of the fifteen-month period from October 1938 to the end of 1939 the RCPA's project list grew to 35 studies, but the group made discouragingly little headway in securing funding. At the group's second annual meeting--in September 1939--just three successes could be reported: two small and one large grant had been received (*1). The large grant occupies an historic place in the history of the modern alcoholism movement and an account of its winning will be provided in a moment. By that same September, however, Karl Bowman and a special financial committee were struggling to figure out how to make use of Wet offers of financial support. Their proposal for doing so, which the RCPA would adopt in October 1939, would ideally turn the group's research attentions for the first time exclusively to projects addressing alcoholism as opposed to the larger array of alcohol-related issues that had formerly comprised the group's approved study lists. All proposed projects not addressing some aspect of alcoholism would be dropped from the approved list.
I
The Carnegie Corporation was one of several foundations the RCPA group turned to after Rockefeller's rejection. In this case the group would prove successful in winning a $25,000 grant to review the literature on alcohol's effects on man, which grant in turn would bring E.M. Jellinek into the field and, in effect, start the movement's ball rolling. The grant request, after more than a year of Carnegie ambivalence, was finally approved on 23 May 39, and was the by-now two-year old RCPA's first substantial victory in its exhausting grant-getting enterprise.
By the spring of 1938 the Carnegie Corporation president, Frederick P. Keppel, had served for 15 years in that post, and, according to Nielsen (1972, p. 36), had run the organization "largely as a one-man show" but nevertheless wielding power with openness and a spirit of personal accessibility. As it happens, Keppel commissioned Gunnar Myrdal's An American Dilemma in 1938, and the foreword he wrote for Myrdal's two-volume work could probably have echoed his justification for proffering support to the RCPA as well. Therein, Keppel "cautiously justified" the foundation's involvement with contemporary social issues in terms that were thoroughly congruent with the spirit of the RCPA's envisioned enterprise.
- - -
Moore first contacted Keppel in mid-March 1938, at which time Keppel gave Moore "no assurances of great interest, but did make it clear that he would not be afraid of the problem because it is at present an unpopular one" (Moore to Wilbur, 17 Mar 38, LMA). Moore asked Wilbur if he were willing to write to Keppel "merely emphasizing that we are dealing with a major social problem that is likely to grow more important during the next decade and that in your judgment we have brought together a competent group for the purpose?" Wilbur promptly did so, writing Keppel of the RCPA as a group "some of us have set up in the hope that a thorough scientific study of the alcohol question can be made without prejudice and without partisanship" (Wilbur to Keppel, 19 Mar 38, CCA).
As luck would have it, Keppel soon left for Europe, and did not take up the RCPA's request immediately (Moore to Wilbur, 30 Mar 38). Contact with Keppel and Carnegie would not resume until late October, more than six months later, and after the group had been formally presented in the New York Times and Science reports. In late October Keppel's files show his receipt of two letters of encouragement from RCPA Scientific Committee members, one from Luther C. Gulick and the other from Hans T. Clarke (*2). Both letters urged Keppel's positive response to the RCPA at a planned forthcoming meeting on 27 October 1938, and both letters are interesting for the rhetorical touchstones they employed to engage Keppel's interest and support.
Gulick asked Keppel to give the group "some strong support." He noted that Dr. Livingston Farrand (president of Cornell) might accept the group's presidency, and Dr. James R. Angell (president of Yale, and formerly president of the Carnegie Corporation) "has become increasingly interested" in the group. "Numerous individuals with money instead of brains have shown no interest," Gulick noted, expressing an indirect affirmation that the wisdom of the foundation system must be available for worthwhile but unpopular projects such as this to receive support in the society. "If we were working for or against prohibition," Gulick continued, "we might get their support. But unbiased research does not seem to appeal to their emotions." Gulick's letter also noted, "For financial support, our experience of the past few weeks seems to indicate that we must look to the foundations." Gulick's closing paragraph emphasized the RCPA's strongest selling point--namely, its remarkably prestigious roster of American scientists. "I doubt whether ever again as distinguised a group can be brought together for this purpose," he noted (Gulick to Keppel, 26 Oct 38, CCA). Hans T. Clarke's letter, like Gulick's, stressed the reputations and interests of people involved with the RCPA. Clarke cited the late Earl B. McKinley's great interest, the involvement of Harry Moore, Karl Bowman, and himself. He also noted the existence of Anton J. Carlson's similarly oriented group at Chicago and that group's prospective merger with the RCPA, clearing the field of competitors (Clarke to Keppel, 25 Oct 38, CCA).
Neither Keppel's nor Wilbur's files made record of the 27 October 1938 meeting with RCPA members, if it was actually held. The next record appearing in Keppel's files is dated almost two months later (20 Dec 38)--that being a cryptic account of an interview involvidng Keppel and RCPA representatives Luther Gulick, Hans Clarke, and Albert Poffenberger (*3). The roster of the RCPA's now two dozen studies was presented to Keppel and discussed collectively. The account reports that the RCPA group "was ready to disprove the general impression that enough is already known about alcohol and its effects" (Minute, 20 Dec 38, CCA). Interestingly, Bowman noted that he thought Robert A. Fleming, a former Rockefeller man, would be a good project leader for study No. 1, the literature review (*4). "Much of the discussion," the minutes noted, was devoted to discussing what the Council really meant by its secondary objective 'education.' They say they mean neither propaganda nor legislation, but they appear to hesitate when FPK suggested the British term 'vulgarization' (Carnegie Minutes, 20 Dec 38, CCA).
Moore wrote Wilbur of this meeting three days later, noting that Keppel "seems to have been favorably impressed and may give us $25,000 for Study No. 1" (Moore to Wilbur, 23 Dec 38, LMA). Keppel's files show that a more detailed, three-page, single-spaced outline of Study No. 1 was received by the Carnegie Corporation in mid-January 1939. That document reveals, I believe, how the RCPA's Study No. 1 had by then become the repository and reflection of both the original SCNCA group's efforts to gather together the authoritative scientific knowledge on alcohol and Albert Barrows' good advice that any large scientific undertaking ought to begin with an expert and searching examination of the available literature. Under the heading of the "Value of the survey," the following passage provides a clear image of the conjunction of these two influences:
While a great deal of research work has been done on alcohol and while a large number of books and pamphlets have been published for popular consumption, there probably has never been a time when the general public has been so much in doubt as the truth regarding the effects of alcohol on the individual....
- - -
On 2 February 1939 Poffenberger wrote Keppel offering a "personal opinion" on the RCPA and its program, a letter which reveals that Moore himself and his handling of the group's early history was not viewed with pleasure by all observers. Poffenberger began by dismissing the Times ("Scientists Launch," 1938) editorial's notion that enough was already known about alcohol by citing the case of drunk driving, where very little was in fact known with certainty. This lack of knowledge derived, he wrote, from the absence of "systematic, well-planned, long-term and unprejudiced attack." The RCPA offered such a prospect, but it had, according to Poffenberger,
- - -
Keppel had apparently asked Poffenberger on an earlier occasion whether the RCPA was "just a scheme for getting financial support for what people are already doing and probably would do anyway." Poffenberger responded that "that is not the case" and gave reasons why it might appear to have been so. Poffenberger noted that Rockefeller's demand that others support the group first had led the RCPA to emphasize "certain projects at Bellevue and at the New York Psychiatric particularly which were about to be initiated and for which some support was available or in sight were listed [on the group's schedule of projects]" (Poffenberger to Keppel, 2 Feb 39, p. 2, CCA).
- - -
It was this long-range research plan, Poffenberger asserted, that defined the RCPA's potential contribution to the alcohol territory. He closed again emphasizing the newly scientific character and stewardship of the group:
I must repeat that I was skeptical of the original set-up (which has been changed) and am still critical. But I have confidence in the hard-headedness of the scientific committee which has taken active control. Promoters and 'savers of the world' now play a minor role (Poffenberger to Keppel, 2 Feb 39, p. 2, CCA).
Still the process dragged on. In late March Keppel's file indicated that he exchanged correspondence on the RCPA with Vannevar Bush, President of the Carnegie Corporation's sister institution, the Carnegie Institution in Washington, D.C. Keppel apparently sought Bush's impression of the group as well as an indication whether the Washington organization might be in a position to offer the RCPA support. Bush, however, noted that he saw "no way in which it links in especially well with the work of the Institution," though he suggested that such a conclusion should not affect the RCPA's chances with Keppel's Corporation (Bush to Keppel, 20 Mar 39, CCA). In subsequent correspondence Bush noticed that an illustration in the RCPA's brochure--showing a large group of formally-attired guests raising a toast--had been presented in such a way as to leave the impression that "there is something sinful about drinking a toast in this manner." In Bush's view, this misstep suggested that even an effort so deliberately intent upon addressing its subject with "no preconceived notions and on a basis of finding out well established scientific facts and relationships" still nevertheless could easily fall prey to tacit biases. "I suppose it is too much to expect a really scientific, dispassionate, and disinterested entry into his highly controversial field," Bush concluded, "but I wish very much that it could be obtained" (Bush to Keppel, 21 Mar 39, CCA).
Finally, on 15 May 39 Keppel and the Carnegie Corporation received a fully articulated proposal for Study No. 1--accompanied by a cover letter (signed by Moulton, Bowman and Clarke), a newly drafted proposal, a budget, an RCPA membership roster, and an organization/personnel chart. Jolliffe was presented at the proposed study's director, and his qualifications were described as follows:
Dr. Jolliffe is Chief of the Medical Service of the Psychiatric Division of Bellevue Hosptial. In 1937, he conducted a study on the etiology and treatment of alcoholism and the alcoholic psychoses in Europe, with the aid of a special grant from the Rockefeller Foundation. In connection with this study he visited approximately eleven countries. His writings in the field of medicine include 37 titles. Approximately 24 of these are in the general field of alcohol. While they are all collaborations, in each case he is the senior author (Moulton, Bowman, and Clarke to Keppel, 15 May 39, CCA).
http://www-distance.syr.edu/rose.html CHALLENGING THE SYSTEM: THE ADULT EDUCATION MOVEMENT AND THE EDUCATIONAL BUREAUCRACY OF THE 1920s
Amy D. Rose
The Carnegie Corporation entered the discussion on Americanization with a study of the process by which individuals became assimilated. The study, commissioned in 1918 and carried out over the following years, went beyond a study of Americanization classes to encompass an examination of the family, the community, the arts, the media, and other interactions between American and immigrant life in order to uncover which forces encouraged the process and which ones acted negatively.(4) In many ways, the Americanization study stands as a prototype for future Carnegie interest in the education of adults. In its search for the educative aspects of all forms of social interaction, the study went far beyond the strictures normally associated with educational agencies.
In the 1920s the Carnegie Corporation developed a more thorough and systematic policy towards adult education. In 1924 the foundation began to explore the possibility of funding projects in adult education and, in fact, establishing it as a priority area for future grants. Because of a policy mandated by its new President, Frederick P. Keppel, the Corporation set out to consult with leading educators of adults before embarking in its new direction. After a series of meetings held throughout the country, the AAAE was founded in 1926 by a group of adult educators with the blessing of the Carnegie Corporation. While ostensibly an independent organization, it was headed by Morse Cartwright, Keppel's former assistant, and had as its clear purpose the task of making funding recommendations to the Corporation about adult education projects.(5)
While the development of this organization has usually been tied to professionalizing imperatives within the field itself, it is clear that the Carnegie Corporation had other concerns. While some of these related to internal organizational and fiscal pressures, much of the Carnegie focus centered on dissatisfaction with the current system of education within the United States. Adult education was seen as a movement which could rectify some of the problems and shift the educational system away from an ever-increasing bureaucratic structure.
THE CRITIQUE OF SCHOOLING
A principal dynamic behind the growth of adult education in the 1920s was a criticism of the expanded educational systems of the postwar period. While criticism of the schools came from various quarters, some of the strongest came from those who later advocated the movement for adult education. Henry Pritchett, President of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching and Keppel's predecessor as Acting President of the Carnegie Corporation, emerged as a sharp critic of the educational system of the postwar period. Pritchett's views are important because as Acting President he laid the foundation for the eventual Carnegie interest in adult education. Since the background of the Carnegie interest in adult education has not been adequately explored, many of the reasons for this interest have become obscured.
- - -
NOTES 25. Frederick P. Keppel, "Adult Education, Today and Tomorrow," in Education for Adults and Other Essays (New York: Columbia University Press, 1926), 38.